{"id":12551,"date":"2025-01-27T19:19:28","date_gmt":"2025-01-27T19:19:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/?p=12551"},"modified":"2025-01-27T19:19:28","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T19:19:28","slug":"supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims"},"content":{"rendered":"

Cunningham v. Cornell University: What It Means for Prohibited Transactions in ERISA Plans<\/strong><\/h4>\n

This week, the Supreme Court tackled a case that could have big implications for how prohibited transactions are handled under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). In Cunningham v. Cornell University<\/em><\/a>, the Court considered what a plaintiff must allege to survive a motion to dismiss when claiming a prohibited transaction under ERISA Section 406(a)(1)(C).<\/p>\n

Definition<\/strong><\/h5>\n

For those unfamiliar, ERISA Section 406(a)(1)(C)<\/a> prohibits a plan fiduciary from causing the plan to furnish goods, services, or facilities to a “party in interest,” such as a service provider.\u00a0 That is, unless an exemption outlined in Section 408 applies. The case centers on whether plaintiffs need to allege that these services were unnecessary or involved unreasonable fees to move forward or whether the mere hiring of a service provider constitutes a prohibited transaction. Here\u2019s what the oral arguments revealed and why this matters to plan participants and fiduciaries.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s at Stake?<\/strong><\/p>\n

The key question is about the threshold for prohibited transaction claims<\/em>. On one side, some circuits require plaintiffs to show that the transaction was unreasonable or unnecessary. On the other side, a simpler approach only requires plaintiffs to allege the existence of the transaction, leaving it to the defendant to prove that an exemption applies.<\/p>\n

Why does this matter? If the Supreme Court adopts a low bar for plaintiffs, it could lead to an explosion of litigation. This could overwhelm fiduciaries and plan sponsors with lawsuits based on minor allegations, forcing them to spend time and resources defending their decisions in court.<\/p>\n

Key Takeaways from Oral Arguments<\/strong><\/p>\n

The justices were deeply divided on the issue, and their questions hinted at broader concerns about balancing protections for plan participants with the practicalities of running a retirement plan. Here are some key themes from the discussions:<\/p>\n

The Role of Exemptions in Section 408<\/strong><\/p>\n

ERISA Section 408 provides exemptions for transactions that are \u201cnecessary\u201d and involve \u201creasonable\u201d compensation. The justices debated whether these exemptions are part of Section 406\u2019s definition of a prohibited transaction (meaning plaintiffs must address them upfront) or whether they serve as an affirmative defense that defendants raise later.<\/p>\n

Justice Jackson and Justice Sotomayor appeared sympathetic to the idea that defendants should bear the burden of proving the exemptions, while other justices, like Kagan and Barrett, explored whether this approach could complicate the application of other statutes.<\/p>\n

Concerns About a Flood of Litigation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Justices Kavanaugh and Alito expressed strong concerns about the potential consequences of lowering the bar for prohibited transaction claims. They questioned whether this would lead to frivolous lawsuits that automatically proceed to costly discovery simply because a plan hired a service provider. These justices emphasized the importance of protecting plan sponsors and fiduciaries from a wave of litigation that could ultimately harm plan participants by driving up costs.<\/p>\n

Workarounds for Managing Claims<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Solicitor General, who supported the plaintiffs, argued that district courts already have tools to weed out meritless claims. For example, courts could require plaintiffs to provide additional details early in the process if the defendant raises an exemption in its motion to dismiss. However, some justices questioned whether such \u201cworkarounds\u201d would be practical or effective.<\/p>\n

What Does This Mean for You?<\/strong><\/p>\n

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, it could significantly lower the bar for filing prohibited transaction claims. While this might empower plan participants to hold fiduciaries accountable for unreasonable fees or unnecessary services, it also raises the risk of overburdening retirement plans with lawsuits.<\/p>\n

For fiduciaries, this means extra diligence will be required when selecting service providers and documenting why their fees and services are necessary and reasonable. Transparency and careful adherence to ERISA\u2019s fiduciary standards will be more critical than ever.<\/p>\n

For plan participants, a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs could offer stronger protections by making it easier to challenge questionable transactions. However, there\u2019s a risk that increased litigation could lead to higher costs for everyone, as plan sponsors pass on legal expenses.<\/p>\n

What Happens Next?<\/strong><\/h4>\n

The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA. Whether the ruling tilts toward plaintiffs or defendants, the case underscores the importance of balancing participant protections with the practical realities of plan administration.<\/p>\n

Stay tuned for updates on this landmark case and what it means for ERISA compliance and retirement plan management. In the meantime, fiduciaries and plan sponsors should review their processes for hiring service providers to ensure they\u2019re aligned with ERISA\u2019s fiduciary standards.<\/p>\n

uDirect IRA Services, LLC is here to help you build your retirement savings.\u00a0 We are not a fiduciary and we do not offer tax or legal advice. We do not recommend specific investments, rather we guide you through the process to self-direct your retirement savings into assets you choose.\u00a0 To get started, we offer a free consultation. Schedule yours HERE<\/a>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0 To open an account, click\u00a0HERE<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cunningham v. Cornell University: What It Means for Prohibited Transactions in ERISA Plans This week, the Supreme Court tackled a case that could have big implications for how prohibited transactions are handled under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). In Cunningham v. Cornell University, the Court considered what a plaintiff must allege to survive…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":12552,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nSupreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"uDirect IRA Services, LLC\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uDirectIRA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"484\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Kaaren Hall\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@uDirectIRA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@uDirectIRA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Kaaren Hall\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Kaaren Hall\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4226cdbfe8048d9e88896a4a30bae58b\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\"},\"wordCount\":829,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00\",\"description\":\"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg\",\"width\":1560,\"height\":484,\"caption\":\"The front of the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/\",\"name\":\"uDirect IRA Services, LLC\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"uDirect IRA Services, LLC\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/NEW.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/NEW.png\",\"width\":1932,\"height\":577,\"caption\":\"uDirect IRA Services, LLC\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uDirectIRA\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/uDirectIRA\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/udirectiraservices\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/851967\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/uDirectIRA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4226cdbfe8048d9e88896a4a30bae58b\",\"name\":\"Kaaren Hall\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2076f15ff2ada720099a68cef57a2de3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2076f15ff2ada720099a68cef57a2de3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Kaaren Hall\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/author\/khalludirectira-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC","description":"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC","og_description":"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.","og_url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/","og_site_name":"uDirect IRA Services, LLC","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uDirectIRA","article_published_time":"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1560,"height":484,"url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Kaaren Hall","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@uDirectIRA","twitter_site":"@uDirectIRA","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Kaaren Hall","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/"},"author":{"name":"Kaaren Hall","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4226cdbfe8048d9e88896a4a30bae58b"},"headline":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims","datePublished":"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/"},"wordCount":829,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg","inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/","url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/","name":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims - uDirect IRA Services, LLC","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg","datePublished":"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-27T19:19:28+00:00","description":"The Court\u2019s decision could reshape how prohibited transaction claims are handled under ERISA.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Supreme-Court.jpg","width":1560,"height":484,"caption":"The front of the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/supreme-court-decision-could-reshape-prohibited-transaction-claims\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court Decision could reshape prohibited transaction claims"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/","name":"uDirect IRA Services, LLC","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#organization","name":"uDirect IRA Services, LLC","url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/NEW.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/NEW.png","width":1932,"height":577,"caption":"uDirect IRA Services, LLC"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uDirectIRA","https:\/\/x.com\/uDirectIRA","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/udirectiraservices\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/851967","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/c\/uDirectIRA"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/4226cdbfe8048d9e88896a4a30bae58b","name":"Kaaren Hall","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2076f15ff2ada720099a68cef57a2de3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/2076f15ff2ada720099a68cef57a2de3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Kaaren Hall"},"url":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/author\/khalludirectira-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12551\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12552"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/udirectira.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}