IRS Private Letter Ruling Offers Insight on Inherited IRAs

June 22, 2026

IRS Private Letter Ruling Offers Insight on Inherited IRAs Passing Through an Estate

The IRS recently released Private Letter Ruling 202624001, which addresses the treatment of an inherited IRA under Internal Revenue Code sections 408 and 401(a)(9).

While the ruling is not necessarily groundbreaking, it is still worth discussing because it highlights an important issue: what happens when an IRA owner dies without a beneficiary designation on file, causing the IRA to pass through the decedent’s estate?

For self-directed IRA investors, estate planning attorneys, tax professionals, and beneficiaries, this ruling is a useful reminder that beneficiary designations matter—and that the way an inherited IRA is titled and distributed can have significant consequences.

What Is a Private Letter Ruling?

A Private Letter Ruling, often called a PLR, is a written decision issued by the IRS in response to a taxpayer’s request for guidance on how tax law applies to a specific set of facts.

A PLR can be helpful because it shows how the IRS analyzed a particular situation. However, it is important to understand that a PLR is not the same as a regulation, revenue ruling, or court decision.

A private letter ruling generally applies only to the taxpayer who requested it. It may offer insight into IRS reasoning, but it cannot be used or cited as precedent by other taxpayers.

In other words, PLR 202624001 is educational and informative, but investors and beneficiaries should not assume the same result will automatically apply to their own situation.

What Happened in PLR 202624001?

In this ruling, the decedent owned a traditional IRA. The IRA custodian reported that there was no beneficiary designation on record for the IRA. As a result, the decedent’s estate was treated as the sole beneficiary of the IRA.

The decedent’s will named three children as beneficiaries of the IRA and other residuary estate assets. The executor proposed dividing the IRA into three equal parts and transferring each part by trustee-to-trustee transfer into separate inherited IRAs for the benefit of each child.

The proposed titling of each inherited IRA was:

“Decedent (Deceased) IRA f/b/o [Beneficiary’s Name] as beneficiary of Decedent’s estate.”

That titling is one of the most interesting parts of the ruling. It reflects the fact that the children were receiving their inherited IRA interests through the estate, rather than as beneficiaries named directly on the IRA beneficiary designation form.

Estate as Beneficiary Versus Individual Designated Beneficiary

Under the required minimum distribution rules, the identity of the beneficiary matters.

An individual named directly on an IRA beneficiary designation form may be a designated beneficiary. However, an estate is not an individual and therefore is generally not a designated beneficiary for purposes of Code section 401(a)(9).

That distinction can affect the post-death distribution rules.

In PLR 202624001, because the estate was treated as the beneficiary of the IRA, the beneficiaries were permitted to establish inherited IRAs for their respective interests, but the RMD calculation was based on the decedent’s remaining life expectancy. The IRS ruled that each beneficiary could receive required distributions from their respective inherited IRA using the decedent’s remaining life expectancy.

What About the SECURE Act 10-Year Rule?

One noteworthy point is that the ruling appears to implicitly confirm that the 10-year rule enacted under the SECURE Act does not apply when the IRA owner’s estate is the beneficiary.

Why?

Because the 10-year rule generally applies when there is a designated beneficiary, and the Code and regulations define a designated beneficiary as an individual. An estate is not an individual.

This does not mean that naming an estate as beneficiary is usually the best outcome. In fact, it can create complexity and may limit planning options. But the ruling provides a helpful example of how the IRS views an inherited IRA when the IRA passes through an estate.

Trustee-to-Trustee Transfer Was Not Treated as a Taxable Distribution

The IRS also ruled that the proposed transfer of each beneficiary’s respective interest from the original IRA into separate inherited IRAs would not be treated as a taxable distribution.

This is important because inherited IRAs generally cannot be rolled over in the same way a living IRA owner might roll over their own IRA assets. However, a properly structured trustee-to-trustee transfer from one inherited IRA arrangement to another can be different from a rollover.

In this case, the IRS concluded that the trustee-to-trustee transfers to properly titled inherited IRAs would not constitute taxable distributions and would not be treated as rollovers.

Why Beneficiary Designations Matter

This ruling is a reminder that IRA beneficiary designations should be reviewed regularly.

A will may say who should receive assets, but retirement accounts often pass according to the beneficiary designation on file with the custodian. If no beneficiary designation exists, or if the designation is outdated, the IRA may pass to the estate by default.

That can lead to:

  • Probate involvement
  • More administrative steps
  • Potentially less favorable distribution rules
  • Confusion for heirs
  • Additional legal and tax guidance needs

For IRA owners, the lesson is simple: keep beneficiary designations current.

For beneficiaries and estate representatives, the lesson is equally important: inherited IRA transfers should be handled carefully, especially when the estate is involved.

Key Takeaways from PLR 202624001

Here are the main points investors and beneficiaries should understand:

  1. If an IRA owner dies without a beneficiary designation on file, the estate may be treated as the IRA beneficiary.
  2. An estate is not an individual and generally is not a designated beneficiary for RMD purposes.
  3. Beneficiaries of the estate may be able to establish separate inherited IRAs for their respective interests.
  4. Proper inherited IRA titling matters, especially when the beneficiary inherits through the estate.
  5. Required minimum distributions may be calculated using the decedent’s remaining life expectancy when the IRA owner died after the required beginning date and there is no designated beneficiary.
  6. A properly handled trustee-to-trustee transfer may avoid being treated as a taxable distribution.
  7. A private letter ruling is informative, but it is not precedent for other taxpayers.

Final Thoughts

PLR 202624001 is a useful reminder that inherited IRA rules can be technical, especially when an estate becomes involved. The ruling does not create new law, but it does offer helpful insight into how the IRS may analyze inherited IRA titling, trustee-to-trustee transfers, and required minimum distributions when an IRA passes through an estate.

At uDirect IRA Services, we help investors understand the administrative side of self-directed retirement accounts, including inherited IRA situations. Because tax and estate planning consequences can vary, IRA owners, beneficiaries, and executors should work closely with qualified tax and legal professionals before taking action.

Have questions about self-directed IRAs or inherited IRA administration? Contact uDirect IRA Services to learn more.

Compliance Note:
This article is for educational purposes only and should not be treated as tax, legal, or investment advice. Consult a qualified tax or legal professional regarding your specific situation.

 

Contact uDirect IRA

Whether you want to invest in real estate, private companies, private lending, precious metals, or other alternative assets, uDirect IRA can help you understand how self-directed retirement accounts work.

We’re here to help you stay informed while you build retirement wealth confidently and intelligently.

Call us today at (866) 447-6598
Email us at info@uDirectIRA.com
Book a call HERE

Let’s make your retirement investing work for you — not just Wall Street.